References cited that are mostly good, credible and relevant sometimes poor use of apa referencing style including in-text citations

N8002
Assessment 3: Reflective Improvement Plan
Assessment 3: Reflective Improvement Plan
Due Oct 16 by 6:59 Points 50 Submitting a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 3 Available Jul 16 at 7:00 – Oct 17 at 6:59
Assessment 3: Written Assignment 3000 words (50%), due week 13: Reflective Improvement Plan Students will formulate a reflective plan on an issue they have identified in their specialty practice that requires improvement. The students need to state the objectives for the plan, conduct a critical review of the literature, and synthesise contemporary knowledge about reflective practice to develop strategies that will improve their professional practice. Assessment Instructions Identify a clinical issue/situation you have reflected upon that requires improvement;
Identify a reflective model/theory you are going to utilise in this plan;
State the objectives of the reflective plan;
Conduct a critical literature review utilising at least 12 refereed journal articles using key terms, and appropriate search engines to assist in finding supporting evidence;
Synthesise the identified relevant literature into a coherent and logical discussion paper about what is known on the topic and what strategies you have identified to improve the specialty practice.
Assessment 3 will be assessed using the following rubric:
Criteria High Distinction (HD) Distinction (D) Credit (C) Pass (P) Fail (F) 80 – 100% 70 – 79% 60 – 69% 50 – 59% 0 – 49% Knowledge
application An excellent demonstration of a theory/model and consistently linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic. A very good demonstration of the theory/model clearly linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic. A good demonstration of the theory/model, linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic. A satisfactory demonstration of the theory/model with limited links to the specific aspects of the selected topic. A poor demonstration of the reflection theory/model that is not aligned to the selected topic. Mark /10 8 -10 7 6 5 < 5 Description of a clinical issue Reflection on improvement Development of
action plan A comprehensive critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate in-depth insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan aligns
A broad critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate insight into the issues presented. Response
demonstrates a strong
reflection on, and
personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies An adequate critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates some reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies A brief critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate
satisfactory insight into the issues presented. Response
demonstrates satisfactory reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies An extremely limited analysis of a clinical practice issue is presented Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate little to no insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates a weak reflection on, and does not provide a personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies precisely to the issues identified Reflection and
improvement plan aligns strongly to the issues identified Reflection and improvement plan aligns well to the issues identified Reflection and
improvement plan
aligns satisfactorily to the issues identified Reflection and improvement plan does not align to the issues identified Mark /25 16-20 17.5 15 12.5 < 12.5 Critical analysis and synthesis supported by the relevant literature Incorporates an excellent approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by relevant literature Incorporates a very good approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by relevant literature Incorporates a very good approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by some relevant literature Incorporates a limited approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by some literature Incorporates a poor approach to critical analysis including inadequate or illogical
arguments and
literature Mark /5 4 – 5 3.5 3 2.5 < 2.5 Structure and language use Presents an excellent, well-integrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates very high language competence (no grammar, spelling or punctuation errors) Presents a good, wellintegrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates high language competence (very few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors) Presents a reasonably, well-integrated, logical and coherent structure including an
introduction, body and
conclusion Demonstrates moderate language competence (with few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors) Presents an integrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates moderate to low language competence (with some grammar, spelling or punctuation errors) Presents a poorly integrated and incoherent structure that may not include an introduction, body and/or conclusion Demonstrates poor language competence (with substantial grammar, spelling or punctuation errors that impedes meaning) Mark /5 4 – 5 3.5 3 2.5 < 2.5 References and referencing Excellent, credible and relevant references cited Meticulous use of APA referencing style including many apt in-text
citations Very good, credible and relevant references cited Appropriate use of
APA referencing style including a range of intext citations Good, credible and relevant references cited Appropriate use of APA referencing style including in-text citations References cited that are mostly good, credible and relevant Sometimes poor use of APA referencing style including in-text citations References cited that are mostly not credible or relevant Many inaccuracies and poor use of APA referencing style including limited in-text citation Mark /5 4 – 5 3.5 3 2.5 7.9 pts
High Distinction- HD
An excellent demonstration of a theory/model and consistently linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Distinction- D
A very good demonstration of the theory/model clearly linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic
6.9 to >5.9 pts
Credit- C
A good demonstration of the theory/model, linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
5.9 to >4.9 pts
Pass- P
A satisfactory demonstration of the theory/model with limited links to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
4.9 to >0 pts
Fail- F
A poor demonstration of the reflection theory/model that is not aligned to the selected topic.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of a clinical issue Reflection on improvement Development of action plan
25 to >19.75 pts
High Distinction- HD
A comprehensive critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate in-depth insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates an indepth reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan aligns precisely to the issues identified
19.75 to >17.25 pts
Distinction- D
A broad critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates a strong reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan aligns strongly to the issues identified
17.25 to >14.75 pts
Credit- C
An adequate critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates some reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan aligns well to the issues identified
14.75 to >12.25 pts
Pass- P
A brief critical analysis of a clinical practice issue is identified. Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate satisfactory insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates satisfactory reflection on, and personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan aligns satisfactorily to the issues identified
12.25 to >0 pts
Fail- F
An extremely limited analysis of a clinical practice issue is presented Viewpoints and interpretations demonstrate little to no insight into the issues presented. Response demonstrates a weak reflection on, and does not provide a personalisation of the concepts, which includes personal thoughts and feelings and/or strategies Reflection and improvement plan does not align to the issues identified
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical analysis and synthesis supported by the relevant literature
5 to >3.95 pts
High Distinction- HD
Incorporates an excellent approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by relevant literature
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Distinction- D
Incorporates a very good approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by relevant literature
3.45 to >2.95 pts
Credit- C
Incorporates a very good approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by some relevant literature
2.95 to >2.45 pts
Pass- P
Incorporates a limited approach to critical analysis including arguments supported by some literature
2.45 to >0 pts
Fail- F
Incorporates a poor approach to critical analysis including inadequate or illogical arguments and literature
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
Structure and
language use
5 to >3.95 pts
High Distinction- HD
Presents an excellent, well-integrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates very high language competence (no grammar, spelling or punctuation errors)
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Distinction- D
Presents a good, well-integrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates high language competence (very few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors)
3.45 to >2.95 pts
Credit- C
Presents a reasonably, wellintegrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates moderate language competence (with few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors)
2.95 to >2.45 pts
Pass- P
Presents an integrated, logical and coherent structure including an introduction, body and conclusion Demonstrates moderate to low language competence (with some grammar, spelling or punctuation errors)
2.45 to >0 pts
Fail- F
Presents a poorly integrated and incoherent structure that may not include an introduction, body and/or conclusion Demonstrates poor language competence (with substantial grammar, spelling or punctuation errors that impedes meaning)
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and referencing
5 to >3.95 pts
High Distinction- HD
Excellent, credible and relevant references cited Meticulous use of APA referencing style including many apt intext citations
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Distinction- D
Very good, credible and relevant references cited Appropriate use of APA referencing style including a range of in-text citations
3.45 to >2.95 pts
Credit- C
Good, credible and relevant references cited Appropriate use of APA referencing style including intext citations
2.95 to >2.45 pts
Pass- P
References cited that are mostly good, credible and relevant Sometimes poor use of APA referencing style including in-text citations
2.45 to >0 pts
Fail- F
References cited that are mostly not credible or relevant Many inaccuracies and poor use of APA referencing style including limited in-text citation
5 pts
Total Points: 50

Leave a Comment